期刊论文

中文

首都体育学院学报

1009-783X

2019

31

1

45-50,55

10.14036/j.cnki.cn11-4513.2019.01.010

国家社会科学基金项目(11CFX076)

本校为第一机构

对《世界反兴奋剂条例》3.2条进行分析和阐释,以探析此条规定对当事人的证明责任及其权益造成的影响,以期为我国处理兴奋剂案件提供参考。《世界反兴奋剂条例》3.2条推定规则的设置更多是为了证明的便捷,但是是针对反兴奋剂组织的证明便捷,而并没有针对运动员的便利而设置的推定。在这种情形下,要避免反兴奋剂组织和运动员利益的过度失衡。2015年版《世界反兴奋剂条例》3.2条有较大的变化,对当事人证明责任的影响很大,对推定规则的适用进行辨析,同时发现存在一些有待澄清的问题。对国际体育仲裁院的案例进行考察,以进一步促进对3.2条的含义的理解和掌握。

Article 3.2 of the World Anti-doping Regulations is analyzed and explained in order to explore the effect of this article on the parties’ burden of proof and their rights and interests, so as to provide reference for the treatment of doping cases in China. The setting of Article 3.2 of the World Anti-doping Regulations is more convenient to prove, but it is easy to prove for the anti-doping organization, but it has not been presumed for the convenience of the athletes. In this case, the excessive imbalance of the interests of anti-doping organ...